This attached article reflects the ongoing tension between the little board community and the community-at-large. The article itself, and the accompanying commentary, overtly reflect the ongoing tension between historic versus progressive movement, and the monetary concerns that are reflected throughout the land-based community when it comes to support of the community and the waterways. Given the dilapidated condition of many of the boats described in this article, it would seem as if the community presented in this case is a perfect case study of this disconnect.
One issue not highlighted in this article is that of environmental concerns. This is the third leg of the anti-live aboard stool.
As a member of both communities it is hard not to see the core justification in both sides’ position, although so many of the positions are often fueled by mis-perception and scapegoating. In reality, this dialog, relived in scores of communities, tends to be more aptly described as a political dialog rather than a social one. For instance, the boaters are a group easily targeted, diverse and unrepresented, while other segments of society who are better represented can be a much more significant draw on a community’s social, monetary and environmental infrastructure (see, for instance, fishing boats and impoverished communities).
With that in mind, here is one recent example of this dialog.
Bainbridge liveaboards facing ‘end of days’ – Bainbridge Island Review
In future discussions, we will visit some of the neighborhood revitalization issues and the impact on the boating community.